Joseph Supornick & Son, Inc. v. Imperial Assur. Co. of New York
District Court, D. Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
DONOVAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff sued as assignee of rights of the •insured under fire insurance policies issued by the defendants. Defendants admit the issuance of the insurance, the occurrence of the fire and the assignment of the loss by insured to plaintiff, and allege fraud and misrepresentation on the part of insured and plaintiff. Plaintiff’s theory of suit and trial is that of adjustment claimed to have been arrived at by the parties, and which plaintiff contends amounts to a compromise and settlement. Defendants contend the policies of insurance and the adjustment are void because…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Wiesman v. American Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
- Silliman v. DobnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Wilms v. New Hampshire Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
- Powers Dry Goods Co. v. Imperial Fire Ins.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Alma State Savings Bank v. Springfield Fire & Marine Ins.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Buffalo Insurance Company, a Corporation v. Dorothy K. Amyx, Agricultural Insurance Company of Watertown, a Corporation v. Dorothy K. Amyx, ætna Insurance Company, a Corporation v. Dorothy K. AmyxCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958
- Omaha Paper Stock Co. v. California Union InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1978
- Buffalo Insurance v. AmyxCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958