First Nat. Bank in Bartlesville v. Bell
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
HERR, C.
This is a suit on a promissory note originally brought in the district court of Oklahoma county by the First National Bank in Bartlesville against S. E. Bell to recover the sum of $7,904.05, with interest thereon at 8 per cent, from the 1st day of September, 1922, and 10 per cent, attorney’s fee. The note sued on bears date of September 1, 1922, and, omitting the date line, is as follows:
“On demand, and if no demand is made, then on Dec. 1, 1922, I, we, or either of us promise to pay to the order of First National Bank in Bartlesville at its office in Bar-tlesville, Oklahoma,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Citizens' Bank of Los Angeles v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Brown v. BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
- Sullivan v. EllisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915
- Dawley v. WheelerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1880
- Young v. WestonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1855
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- WAMCO, III, Ltd. v. First Piedmont Mortgage Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1994
- Stanbury v. LarsenWyoming Supreme Court · 1990
- Loomis v. Republic National Bank of Dallas, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1983
- Grayson v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
- Reese v. First Missouri Bank & Trust Co. of Creve CoeurMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.