Legal Opinion

Grover v. City of Manhattan

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 4, 1967No. 44,626PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

O’Connor, J.:

This is a damage action instituted by the plaintiff against the City of Manhattan and one of its employees. From an order of the district court sustaining the city’s motion for summary judgment, the plaintiff has appealed. The employee is not a party to this appeal.

The question presented concerns the liability of a municipality in the operation and maintenance of its zoo.

The events giving rise to the appeal may be briefly summarized. Jimmy Lee Grover, age ten, while visiting the Sunset Zoo on September 23, 1962, suffered injuries as a…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Nauheim v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 2019
  2. Harper v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  3. Wendler v. City of Great BendSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  4. Jeakins v. City of El DoradoSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  5. Steifer v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1954

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Kansas Public Employees Retirement System v. Reimer & Koger Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1997
  2. Brown v. Wichita State UniversitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
  3. Culwell v. Abbott Construction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  4. Gorrell v. City of ParsonsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
  5. Woods v. Kansas Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Kansas · 1970

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API