Legal Opinion
Ispass v. Pyramid Motor Freight Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 12, 1945PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES ALGER FEE, District Judge.
This is an action by certain employees against a common carrier by motor in interstate commerce to recover overtime claimed to be due under the provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq. The court held that there was a technical administrative question involved which must be determined by the Interstate Commerce Commission before a judgment could be rendered for plaintiffs.1 However, summary judgment of dismissal was not entered and opportunity was given to plaintiffs to present the question to the Commission.
Now, plaintiffs have…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Abilene Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. Merchants Elevator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- General American Tank Car Corp. v. El Dorado Terminal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Pyramid Motor Freight Corp. v. IspassSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Montgomery Ward & Co. v. Northern Pacific Terminal Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 1953
- Jose Bustos-Ovalle v. H. R. Landon, as District Director of Immigration and Naturalization at Los Angeles, CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- Ispass v. Pyramid Motor Freight Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Ispass v. Pyramid Motor Freight Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1948
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.