State v. Kish
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
ELLETT, Justice:
The defendant below appeals from a jury conviction of assault with intent to commit robbery. The evidence is sufficient to sustain the verdict; however, he claims that errors were committed by the trial court in the following particulars:
1. Defendant was given a more severe penalty because he demanded a jury trial.
2. The- court failed to exclude for all purposes a statement made by defendant.
3. The court failed to appoint separate counsel for defendant.
4. The prosecutor failed to endorse upon the information the names of witnesses other than those testifying at the preliminary…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Cuzick v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
3Cited by10 opinions
- Oregon v. HassSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- State v. GoodmonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. MillsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- State v. SotolongoCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2003
- State v. ThomasUtah Supreme Court · 1976
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.