State v. Thomas
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MAUGHAN, Justice:
Defendant appeals from his conviction, by the court, for the crime of distributing a controlled substance, viz., cocaine. We affirm.
Defendant contends the trial court committed prejudicial error by admitting the testimony of two witnesses at the trial, who were neither named on the information, nor called during the preliminary hearing. The one witness was a toxicologist, who testified as to the contents of a package which an undercover agent purchased from defendant. The other witness was a female employee of the police department, who testified she conducted a search of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. KetchelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- State v. KishUtah Supreme Court · 1972
- State v. RedmondUtah Supreme Court · 1967
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. CallihamUtah Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. CallihamUtah Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. EatonUtah Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. EatonUtah Supreme Court · 1977