Legal Opinion

Cheney v. Hinton Burdick Hall & Spilker, PLLC

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided September 17, 2015No. 20140316-CAPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TOOMEY, Judge:

T1 This case involves a transaction known as a "1031 like-kind exchange," which allows a business or investment property to be sold for a profit and defer paying taxes on the gain as long as the profit is reinvested in a similar property. See LR.C. § 1081 (2012). Here, Clayton A. Cheney, Lorna W. Cheney, and their business, Frontier Building Prod-uets, LLC (collectively, the Cheneys), contracted with an accounting firm, Hinton Bur-dick Hall & Spilker, PLLC (Hinton Burdick), to help them facilitate several like-kind exchanges. But after a seller failed to convey title to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Dixie State Bank v. BrackenUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Oakwood Village LLC v. Albertsons, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2004
  3. R.T. Nielson Co. v. CookUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  4. MacY v. Oklahoma City School District No. 89Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
  5. Fairbourn Commercial, Inc. v. American Housing Partners, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2004

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tidwell v. JensenCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2026
  2. Commerce Commercial Partners v. Milliken & CompanyDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2024
  3. Commerce Commercial Partners v. Milliken & CompanyDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API