Legal Opinion

Packwood v. Senate Select Committee on Ethics

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 2, 1994No. A-704PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Chief Justice Rehnquist, Circuit Justice.

Applicant Senator Bob Packwood requests that I grant a stay pending appeal to the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit of a decision by the District Court enforcing the subpoena duces tecum issued by respondent Senate Select Committee on Ethics. The Court of Appeals recently, and unanimously, denied his emergency motion for a stay pending appeal.

The criteria for deciding whether to grant a stay are well established. An applicant must demonstrate: (1) a reasonable probability that four Justices would vote to grant certiorari; (2) a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Nixon v. Administrator of General ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. O'CONNOR v. OrtegaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1946

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Barr v. East Bay Sanctuary CovenantSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  2. Wolf v. Cook CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2020
  3. Edwards v. Hope Medical Group for WomenSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Strickler v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. United States v. MandyczDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2004

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API