Packwood v. Senate Select Committee on Ethics
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the Court
Chief Justice Rehnquist, Circuit Justice.
Applicant Senator Bob Packwood requests that I grant a stay pending appeal to the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit of a decision by the District Court enforcing the subpoena duces tecum issued by respondent Senate Select Committee on Ethics. The Court of Appeals recently, and unanimously, denied his emergency motion for a stay pending appeal.
The criteria for deciding whether to grant a stay are well established. An applicant must demonstrate: (1) a reasonable probability that four Justices would vote to grant certiorari; (2) a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Nixon v. Administrator of General ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- O'CONNOR v. OrtegaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Barr v. East Bay Sanctuary CovenantSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
- Wolf v. Cook CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2020
- Edwards v. Hope Medical Group for WomenSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Strickler v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- United States v. MandyczDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2004
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.