Wolf v. Cook County
Supreme Court of the United States
1DissentJustice Sotomayor
Today's decision follows a now-familiar pattern. The Government seeks emergency relief from this Court, asking it to grant a stay where two lower courts have not. The Government insists-even though review in a court of appeals is imminent-that it will suffer irreparable harm if this Court does not grant a stay. And the Court yields.
But this application is perhaps even more concerning than past ones. Just weeks ago, this Court granted a stay of a different decision involving the same administrative rule at issue here, after the Government professed urgency because of the form of relief granted…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Department of Homeland Security v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 2020
- Barr v. East Bay Sanctuary CovenantSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
- Williams v. ZbarazSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Packwood v. Senate Select Committee on EthicsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Murphy v. CollierSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Barr v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 2020
- Crista Ramos v. Chad WolfCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Casa De Maryland, Incorporated v. Donald TrumpCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020
- Cook County, Illinois v. Chad F. WolfCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
- City & County of S.F. v. UscisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.