Legal Opinion

United States v. Darrell Jay Glover, United States of America v. Susan Noreen Kozak

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided January 24, 1997No. 95-4096, 95-4101PublishedCited by 95 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURPHY, Circuit Judge.

Defendants Susan Kozak and Darrell Glover entered conditional guilty pleas to possession of methamphetamine with intent to distribute, a violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). They bring these appeals claiming that the district court erred when it refused to grant their pretrial motions to suppress. Kozak claims that the district court erred when it refused to suppress drugs discovered during a search of an Express Mail package and statements she made during an interview with postal inspectors. Glover asserts that the district court erred when it refused to suppress…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by95 opinions

  1. Corley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. United States v. BautistaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  3. United States v. Mesa RithCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  4. United States v. TolesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
  5. United States v. Claudio Lugo, AKA Lugo Mano, Joel Logue-Lugo, Joel Lugo LukeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999

90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API