Legal Opinion

Lamar Advantage GP Co. v. City of Cincinnati

Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County

Decided November 9, 2018No. A-18-04105 (consolidated with Case No. A-18-04125)Published

1Opinion of the CourtCurt C. Hartman, Judge

"It is generally improper for a court to dispose of a case on the merits following a hearing for preliminary injunction without consolidating that hearing with a hearing on the merits or otherwise giving notice to counsel that the merits would be considered." George P. Ballas Buick-GMC, Inc. v. Taylor Buick, Inc., 5 Ohio App.3d 71, 449 N.E.2d 503 (6th Dist. 1982). Nonetheless, because Rule 65(B)(2) of the Ohio Rules of Civil Procedure"provides that consolidation may be ordered 'before or after beginning the hearing,' the trial court can transform a preliminary injunction hearing into a…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Metromedia, Inc. v. City of San DiegoSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. Minneapolis Star & Tribune Co. v. Minnesota Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Noble v. ColwellOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Chef Italiano Corp. v. Kent State Univ.Ohio Supreme Court · 1989

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API