Legal Opinion

Innovative Biodefense, Inc. v. VSP Technologies, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 11, 2020No. 1:12-cv-03710Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK INNOVATIVE BIODEFENSE, INC., Petitioner, – against – OPINION & ORDER 12 Civ. 3710 (ER) VSP TECHNOLOGIES, INC., SAN-MAR LABORATORIES, INC., and CARLO MICCERI, Respondents. Ramos, D.J.: This case concerns a fee dispute between Innovative Biodefense, Inc. (“IBD”)—the plaintiffs in the underlying litigation—and Hill, Farrer & Burrill LLP (“Hill Farrer”)—the law firm that represented IBD in that litigation through the summary judgment stage. After Hill Farrer withdrew from the litigation in September 2015, IBD and Hill Farrer resolved…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Sequa Corp. v. GBJ Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  2. Itar-Tass Russian News Agency v. Russian Kurier, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  3. Kathryn M. Longo v. Shore & Reich, Ltd. Advest, Inc., and Gerald I. ReichCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  4. Stair v. CalhounDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010
  5. ANTONMARCHI v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API