Legal Opinion

Jorgensen-Bennett Mfg. Co. v. Knight

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1928PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Chambliss

Complainant sues to recover excise taxes, interest and penalties collected under Chapter 21, Acts of 1923, paid under protest. The statute imposes an annual tax equal to three per centum of the net earning’s for the preceding year on all corporations and joint stock associations, “arising from business done wholly within the State,” specifically exempting ‘ ‘ earnings arising from interstate commerce. ”

Complainant is a Tennessee corporation, buying, manufacturing and selling lumber, and its liability for the excise tax on profits thus generally earned is conceded and has been discharged.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Budd v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. United States Express Co. v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. McCall v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  5. Osborne v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1897

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Texas Gas Transmission Corp. v. AtkinsTennessee Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Norborne Land Drainage District Co. v. Egypt TownshipSupreme Court of Missouri · 1930
  3. Sky Transpo, Inc. v. City of KnoxvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Memphis Dock & Forwarding Co. v. FortTennessee Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Lebanon Liquors, Inc. v. City of LebanonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API