Reynolds v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Jeffrey H. Reynolds, III, appeals pro se from a district court order that denied his motion for pauper status in a civil rights action that he had filed under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 397, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). His appeal has been referred to a panel of this court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(l), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, the panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed in this case. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a).
Reynolds moved for leave to file his civil rights complaint in forma pauperis (“IFP”). On…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Adkins v. E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
3Cited by16 opinions
- Flippin v. CoburnCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Flippin v. MasseyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Anthony Jones v. Securitas Technology Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2026
- Bailey v. Mahoning County Prosecutors OfficeDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2025
- Cora Franklin v. Cleveland Clinic Lutheran HospitalDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2026
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.