Legal Opinion
Flippin v. Coburn
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided August 13, 2004No. 03-6266PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*521 ORDER
Ameer Xenos Flippin, a Tennessee resident proceeding pro se, appeals a district court order denying his motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. His appeal has been referred to a panel of this court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(l), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed in this case. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a).
Flippin tendered a complaint and a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court. Because the motion consisted of an unsworn declaration that was incomplete, the district court ordered Flip-pin to submit a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Dorothy Floyd v. United States Postal Service, Donald Harants, PostmasterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Kenneth M. Romstadt v. Allstate Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
- Albert G. Gibson v. R.G. Smith CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Fisher v. City of MemphisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Allen Raymond Phipps v. Phylliss KingCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Timmie Cole, Sr. v. J. Ray OrmondCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. BilzerianDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Anthony Jones v. Securitas Technology Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2026
- Ashley Fulton v. Mike LambertDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2026
- Bailey v. Mahoning County Prosecutors OfficeDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2025
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.