Legal Opinion

Daniel RUGGIERI, Et Al., Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. WARNER & SWASEY COMPANY, Defendant, Appellee

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided July 11, 1991No. 90-1734PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CYR, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiffs-appellants Daniel Ruggieri, Anthony Frankian, Stephen Radzik, and Paul Bisceglia were nearing retirement age when defendant-appellee Warner & Swasey Co. discharged them from their employment during the winter of 1985-86. Shortly thereafter, plaintiffs filed age discrimination charges with the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination (“MCAD”), which forwarded their complaints to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”). When relief was not forthcoming from either agency, plaintiffs commenced an action in federal district court under the Age…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Allen Zabielski v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Incorporated, Charles Brom v. Bozell, Jacobs, Kenyon & Eckhardt, Inc., and Bozell Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  2. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Chrysler Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1990

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Alfred F. Harter v. Gaf CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  2. Ernest PETERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA and Cigna Corporation, Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  3. Peterson v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
  4. Fabregas v. I.T.T. Intermedia, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1997
  5. Abner Arcos Sanchez v. Attorney General United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API