Legal Opinion
Rose v. Allstate Insurance Co.
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided December 10, 1987No. 86CA0358PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KELLY, Judge.
In this action to recover under a no-fault automobile insurance policy issued by the defendant, Allstate Insurance Company, defendant appeals the judgment entered in favor of the plaintiff, Daniel J. Rose. The sole issue is defendant’s contention that the trial court erred in ruling that Rose was a pedestriaa at the time of the accident in question. We reverse.
The facts are uncontested. Rose was a passenger in a pickup truck that was returning to Cheyenne after he and two companions had spent the evening in Fort Collins. The driver of the vehicle stopped beside Interstate 25 to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Trinity Universal Insurance Co. v. HallSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
- Tyler v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Newcomb Hospital v. FountainNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
- Clinton v. National Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
- Contrisciane v. Utica Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Rose v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1989
- MFA Mutual Insurance Co. v. Government Employees Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1990