United States ex rel. Ceas v. Chrysler Group LLC
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Robert M. Dow, Jr., United States District Judge
Defendant’s motion for a protective order [53] is denied. Defendant’s motion to stay discovery [59] pending resolution of its motion for a protective order is denied as moot in light of this order. Defendant’s motion for the entry of a confidentiality order [59] is denied without prejudice. The parties are given one week from the date of this order to file an agreed confidentiality order or to file their alternate proposals for resolution by the Court.
STATEMENT
Defendant moved the Court for the entry of a protective order [53] requiring…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Kim Patterson v. Avery Dennison CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Thermal Design, Inc. v. American Society of Heating, Refrigerating & Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- William Fanslow v. Chicago Manufacturing Center, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Cancer Treatment Centers of AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Melgoza v. Rush University Medical CenterDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019