Legal Opinion

Guzan v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 29, 2005PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice BAER.

In this appeal, we consider whether the entry of judgment of sentence in New York State following the entry of a guilty plea is required for Pennsylvania to consider a licensee “convicted” for purposes of the Driver’s License Compact (Compact), 75 Pa.C.S. §§ 1581-1586.1 Because the Commonwealth Court held, under the specific facts of this case, that entry of judgment of sentence was required without consideration of how New York law defines a conviction, we now reverse.

The facts underlying this ease are not in dispute. While residing in Bradford, Pennsylvania, Kim M. Guzan…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Com., Dept. of Transp. v. McCaffertySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Harrington v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Albert v. Lehigh Coal & Navigation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  4. Siekierda v. Com., Dept. of Transp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. Kennedy v. Upper Milford Township Zoning Hearing BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Heller v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Heller v. Commonwealth, Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API