Legal Opinion

Cooper v. Zold

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1965PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallows, J.

The main issue is whether the court’s failure to find undue influence on the part of the primary beneficiary was contrary to the great weight and clear preponderance of the credible evidence. A corollary issue is whether the trial court failed to recognize the inference of undue influence which the appellant claims was established as a matter of law by undisputed evidence. There are minor subsidiary issues which will be stated later.

The parties do not disagree on the basic law governing proof of undue influence or the scope of the appellate power in such cases. Undue influence, of course, as…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Patterson v. JensenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Kuehn v. KuehnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Schlichting v. SchlichtingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Curkeet v. EisenbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Estate of Barnes v. HoranWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. In Matter of Estate of BeckerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Estate of KomarrWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Estate of Hamm v. JenkinsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Estate of McGonigalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Estate of O'LoughlinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API