Legal Opinion

Waechter v. Mitchell

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided August 11, 1993No. 19837PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CAREY, Judge, Pro Tem.

This is an appeal from a judgment dismissing a third-party complaint. The question presented is whether an attorney who is the subject of a malpractice claim may seek indemnity from parties he allegedly failed to sue on behalf of his client in a timely fashion. The judgment is affirmed.

FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS BELOW

Daniel Waechter was struck and killed by a drunken motorist. His widow, Yolanda Waechter, retained the services of attorney Thomas A. Mitchell to file a wrongful death action against the motorist and the persons who had furnished the motorist with alcohol.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. May Trucking Co. v. International Harvester Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Chenery v. Agri-Lines Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Vesely, Otto, Miller & Keefe v. BlakeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  4. Henke v. FoxCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
  5. Barnett v. Eagle Helicopters, Inc.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1992

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Morrison v. ReedDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API