Vesely, Otto, Miller & Keefe v. Blake
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
PETERSON, Justice.
The issue for decision is whether a lawyer, who was found liable in a legal malpractice action for negligent advice rendered to a client which resulted in the client’s failure to sue a physician for medical malpractice before the expiration of the statute of limitations, may recover contribution or indemnity from the physician. We hold that the lawyer may not.
This case arises out of the facts described in Togstad v. Vesely, Otto, Miller & Keefe, 291 N.W.2d 686 (Minn.1980). In that case, John and Joan Togstad successfully sued Jerre Miller and his law firm (appellants) for…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Lambertson v. Cincinnati Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Hendrickson v. Minnesota Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Hendrickson v. Minnesota Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Tolbert v. Gerber Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Togstad v. Vesely, Otto, Miller & KeefeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Martens v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Cherry Hill Manor Associates v. FaugnoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
- Leonard v. Dorsey & Whitney LLPCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Reilly Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- Jakobleff v. Cerrato, Sweeney & CohnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.