Legal Opinion · Dissent

Dowd v. Estate of Dowd

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 1940No. 6799Published

1Dissent

BUDGE, J.,

Dissenting. — The record discloses that respondent, the wife of the deceased, was appointed administratrix of deceased’s estate, The Estate of David F. Dowd. Respondent claimed that certain alleged separate funds of herself made up a part of the estate of the deceased and she presented her claim therefor as a creditor to the probate judge for allowance under the provisions of section 15-621, I. C. A., and the claim was rejected. Respondent then filed suit in the district court of Bonneville county as provided in said section 15-621, I. C. A., naming “The Estate of David F. Dowd,…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Beckett v. SeloverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
  2. Doehla v. PhillipsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  3. In re Estate of SwainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Saunders v. SimmsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  5. More v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API