Legal Opinion

People v. Mayer

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 30, 2003No. B157502PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ARMSTRONG, J.

The City of South Gate requires a candidate for the city council to be a registered voter of the city for 29 days before the election. One can be a registered voter of the city only if one is a resident of the city. Appellant badly wanted to be an elected member of the South Gate City Council. He was not, however, a resident of the city. To avoid the residency requirement, appellant arranged to use the address of a person who lived in the city as his mailing address. He signed under penalty of perjury papers required to qualify him as a candidate in three elections,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. CuevasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. People v. MelhadoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  3. People v. SnyderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  4. People v. ToddCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  5. People v. HawkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. People v. RussellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  2. People v. Leonard CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2014
  3. People v. HagedornCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  4. Marich v. MGM/UA TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC.California Court of Appeal · 2003
  5. People v. GuevaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API