Legal Opinion

People v. Russell

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 21, 2006No. H029753PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McADAMS, J.

Defendant Philip Russell was convicted by jury of one count of receiving a stolen motor vehicle (Pen. Code, § 496d), 1 a felony. The jury also acquitted defendant of one count of possessing drug paraphernalia (Health & Saf. Code, § 11364), a misdemeanor. In a bifurcated proceeding before the court, defendant admitted allegations that he had one prior felony conviction that qualified as a strike under the three strikes law (§§ 667, subds. (b)-(i), 1170.12).

The court denied defendant’s motion for new trial and his request to reduce the receiving stolen property count to a…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. People v. Superior Court (Romero)California Supreme Court · 1996
  5. People v. BrevermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. People v. CovarrubiasCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
  2. People v. LarsenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  3. People v. MolanoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
  4. People v. FendersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  5. People v. LawsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API