United States v. Ruvalcaba
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BOYCE F. MARTIN, JR., Circuit Judge.
Jaime Ruvalcaba appeals the district court’s reliance on his prior state convictions to apply the career offender enhancement in calculating his advisory Guidelines sentencing range. However, the district court properly applied the career offender enhancement and we therefore AFFIRM Ruvalcaba’s sentence at the lower end of the properly calculated Guidelines range.
I
Ruvalcaba pled guilty to conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 (2006). Under the plea agreement, Ruvalcaba accepted responsibility for…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Begay v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Custis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- State v. SingletonOhio Supreme Court · 2009
- United States v. Samuel F. CollingtonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. Terry AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. ArmijoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. MosleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. MeeksCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.