Legal Opinion

United States v. Rodriguez

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided December 21, 2011No. 09-3867PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JANE B. STRANCH, Circuit Judge.

Antonio Rodriguez appeals the district court’s sentence imposed under the career offender guideline. He argues that the district court should not have counted as predicate offenses any of the Ohio felony convictions listed in the Presentence Report (PSR).

We conclude that Rodriguez’s felony conviction in Ohio for aggravated assault qualifies as a crime of violence under the career offender guideline. We also conclude that Rodriguez may not collaterally attack in this appeal his felony conviction in Ohio for felonious assault. Because these two prior crimes…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  2. United States v. BaileySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Begay v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  4. Custis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Daniels v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. United States v. Le' Ardrus BurrisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
  2. United States v. Demario DensonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
  3. United States v. Rede-MendezCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  4. United States v. Terry AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
  5. United States v. Troy WoodruffCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API