Legal Opinion
United States v. Armijo
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided July 12, 2011No. 09-1533PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURPHY, Circuit Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Edward Benito Armijo pleaded guilty to a single count of being a felon illegally in possession of a firearm. 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). The Presentence Investigation Report (“PSR”) concluded Armijo’s base offense level was twenty-four because he had two prior felony convictions for crimes of violence. U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(a)(2) (2008)1 (setting base offense level of twenty-four for unlawful possession of a firearm by a defendant with two previous felony convictions for crimes of violence); id. § 4B 1.2(a) (defining crime of violence). In support of the application…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Begay v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Sykes v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- United States v. KristlCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- United States v. ChitwoodCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
- United States v. McCranieCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. WrayCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. CastilloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.