Stiles v. Godsey
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtSercombe, J.
Plaintiffs brought an action for common-law adverse possession, statutory adverse possession under ORS 105.620(1), and to obtain a prescriptive easement. The land at issue (the disputed area) is along the westerly border of property owned by defendant Stoner that is located adjacent to and east of plaintiffs’ residential lot. Other defendants in the case have rights to an easement over a portion of the land in question. Plaintiffs sought to extinguish all of defendants’ interests in the disputed area. The trial court granted plaintiffs a prescriptive easement over the disputed area but denied…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Norgard v. Busher Et UxOregon Supreme Court · 1960
- Hicklin v. McClearOregon Supreme Court · 1889
- Faulconer v. WilliamsOregon Supreme Court · 1998
- Hoffman v. Freeman Land and Timber, LLC.Oregon Supreme Court · 1999
- Allison v. ShepherdOregon Supreme Court · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Hammond v. HammondCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
- Fitts v. CaseCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- Morris v. KanneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
- Powers v. DagueCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
- TIEU v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.