City of Cincinnati v. Schill
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtStephenson, J.
This court has read the authorities cited by counsel on both sides of this case, and has no quarrel with any of them. The form of the affidavit in this case is not a model, but is it not sufficient under our criminal laws ?
While the plea made to the affidavit was styled a “motion to quash,” it was, as a matter of law, a motion in arrest of judgment. The court is giving Schill the benefit of the rule that a plea is known by its legal effect, when it is improperly named. Were this plea in truth a motion to quash, it was waived as a matter of law when Schill entered his plea to the affidavit.
The…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Ciano v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1922
- State v. BoyattOhio Supreme Court · 1926
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. ZdovcOhio Court of Appeals · 1958
- State v. DinsioOhio Court of Appeals · 1964
- City of Lima v. WardOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- City of Cleveland Heights v. ChristieOhio Supreme Court · 1934
- City of Cincinnati v. LippsOhio Court of Appeals · 1970
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.