Legal Opinion

City of Lima v. Ward

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1967No. 40628PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Lima ordinance No. 969.07 provides in its entirety that “it shall be unlawful for any person to knowingly and willfully resist, obstruct, threaten, menace or abuse any officer in the execution of his office.”

The affidavit, drawn in the words of the ordinance, is not void for indefiniteness. The question of the sufficiency of the affidavit should have been raised by motion to quash before issue joined. Cincinnati v. Schill, 125 Ohio St. 57.

The motion to certify the record is allowed, and the judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed.

Judgment reversed.

Taut, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. City of Cincinnati v. SchillOhio Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of Cleveland v. Washington Mutual BankOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. ReynaOhio Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. City of Cleveland v. Washington Mutual BankOhio Supreme Court · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API