Legal Opinion

City of Cleveland Heights v. Christie

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1934No. 24617PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBevis, J.

Two points are made in the brief of the plaintiff in error:(1) The Court of Appeals could not properly have determined the cause because the transcript and the bill of exceptions were lost and could not be read by the Court of Appeals.(2) The Court of Appeals was in error in deciding that the affidavit did not charge an offense.(1) It appears from the record that on July 11,1933, the “transcript and original papers” were filed in the Court of Appeals. No question is made but that they were filed in time. It is agreed that the affidavit set forth in the statement of facts herein is an exact…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. City of Cincinnati v. SchillOhio Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Daniel Thompson v. Edward Gaffney and William HallCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
  2. Daniel Thompson v. Edward Gaffney and William HallCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API