Legal Opinion

Nissan Division of Nissan Motor Corp. in U.S.A. v. Fred Anderson Nissan

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 7, 1993No. 9210SC802PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCRODDEN, Judge.

On 1 October 1991, certain amendments to the Motor Vehicle Dealers and Manufacturers Licensing Law (the Licensing Law), N.C. Gen. Stat. §§ 20-285 to -308.2 (1989 and Supp. 1992), became effective. The General Assembly amended Section 20-305 to provide for administrative review of an automobile manufacturer or distributor’s refusal to approve a dealer’s relocation of its facilities. Under the amended statute, after receiving written notice of a proposed relocation, a manufacturer must send the dealer written notice of its opposition to the relocation by registered or certified…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mazda Motors of America, Inc. v. Southwestern Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Gardner v. GardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Wayman L. Prince v. Michael J. PoulosCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
  4. In Re the Appeal of HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  5. Warzynski v. Empire Comfort Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fulton v. MickleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  2. Nissan Division v. NissanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  3. Nissan Division v. NissanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API