Legal Opinion

Nissan Division v. Nissan

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 29, 1994No. 422PA93PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MITCHELL, Justice.

The controlling facts in this case are not in dispute. In December of 1981, Fred Anderson Nissan (hereinafter “Anderson”) entered into a “Nissan Dealer Sales and Service Agreement” (hereinafter “agreement”) with the Nissan Division of Nissan Motor Corporation. Under the terms of the agreement, Anderson was to obtain written consent from Nissan prior to relocating the dealership.

In March of 1991, Anderson learned that Paul Meeker, the owner and sales operator of Meeker Lincoln-Mercury, Inc., was interested in selling his facility located at 252 Patton Avenue in Asheville,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Fleisher Engineering & Construction Co. v. United States Ex Rel. HallenbeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Guthrie v. RaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  3. Wayman L. Prince v. Michael J. PoulosCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
  4. In Re the Appeal of HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  5. Warzynski v. Empire Comfort Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fulton v. MickleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  2. John Kuhni & Sons Inc. v. Labor Comm'nCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2018
  3. Dixon v. Tesla Motors, Inc.District Court, W.D. Texas · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API