Nissan Division v. Nissan
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1DissentJustice Frye
I agree with the majority that the Court of Appeals erred in concluding that notice by Federal Express constitutes mail within the meaning of N.C.G.S. § 20-305(4). I conclude however, as did Judge Wells in the Court of Appeals, that defendant has suffered no prejudice here. I therefore dissent from that portion of the majority opinion holding that because plaintiff sent its notice of objection through Federal Express rather than U.S. Mail it has waived any objection to defendant’s proposed relocation.
The purpose of the North Carolina Motor Vehicle Dealers and Manufacturers Licensing Law is to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Mazda Motors of America, Inc. v. Southwestern Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Mazda Motors of America, Inc. v. Southwestern Motors, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- American Motors Sales Corp. v. PetersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- Nissan Division of Nissan Motor Corp. in U.S.A. v. Fred Anderson NissanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993