United States Ex Rel. Brooks v. Lockheed Martin Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Per curiam
Kenneth P. Brooks, a pro se litigant, appeals from the district court’s order dismissing his False Claims Act complaint. Lockheed Martin has moved to dismiss the appeal, arguing that Brooks cannot pursue his action pro se. * We grant the motion in part and dismiss the qui tam claims. We affirm the district court’s dismissal of Brooks’ retaliation claim.
A lay person may not bring a qui tam action under the False Claims Act. See United States ex rel. Lu v. Ou, 368 F.3d 773, 775-76 (7th Cir.2004). Although a qui tam relator is entitled by statute to a share of the recovery if his action is…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Friedrich Lu v. David W. OuCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- United States Ex Rel. Brooks v. Lockheed Martin Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 2006
3Cited by27 opinions
- Joseph Wojcicki v. SCANA CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020
- La Mar Gunn v. Credit Suisse AGCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
- McGhee v. LightDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2019
- In Re MitranoDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2012
- Myers v. SimpsonDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2011
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.