Legal Opinion
La Mar Gunn v. Credit Suisse AG
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided April 21, 2015No. 13-4738UnpublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION *
2Per curiam
La Mar Gunn appeals from the District Court’s order dismissing his complaint. For the reasons that follow, we will affirm the District Court’s judgment.
In January 2013, Gunn filed a pro se qui tarn action under the False Claims Act (“FCA”), 31 U.S.C. § 3730 et seq., on behalf of the United States. 1 He was granted leave to proceed with the action in forma pauperis. Gunn alleged violations against appellees for civil fraud under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1964. In particular, Gunn alleged that appellees Nikole Shelton and Credit Suisse Group AG…
3Cases cited14 opinions
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Norman Grayson v. Mayview State Hospital Allegheny County Jail Camp Hill Prison United States of America, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- Michael Malik Allah v. Thomas SeiverlingCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Simon v. Hartford Life, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Timson v. SampsonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by23 opinions
- Joseph Wojcicki v. SCANA CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020
- John Olagues v. Ward Timken, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
- Belt v. Fed. Bureau of PrisonsDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2018
- AIKENS v. CIRCLE KDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
- Allen Caudle v. Rentokil North America Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2026
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.