State v. Doerge
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.
Defendant was found guilty after jury trial of the crime of unlawful possession of a narcotic drug, namely, marihuana in hashish form. ORS 474.020. ① The trial judge suspended imposition of sentence and placed defendant on probation for three years.
On appeal defendant contends that the trial judge erred: (1) in failing to grant a directed verdict of not guilty because the state had failed to prove that defendant had actual knowledge of the nature of the narcotic drug contained in the package mailed to him and (2) in instructing the jury as follows:
“You are also instructed that the evidence…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State v. NixCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
- State v. NeelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
- State v. KnissOregon Supreme Court · 1969
- State v. ChristensonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Commonwealth v. AguiarMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Lockhart v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1997
- Walker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1977
- State v. RichardsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978