Pierce v. Riley
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
—This is an appeal from a judgment denying a petition for a writ of mandamus and dismissing the proceeding. The writ was sought to compel the state controller to draw a warrant for the petitioner’s increase of salary as secretary of the state board of equalization on the theory that his salary was fixed by the board according to the provisions of section 3692, subdivision 12, of the Political Code as amended in 1933. (Stats. 1933, p. 2689.) The respondent contends that the salary which was allowed the secretary by the board was not “effectual and payable” until it was first approved…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- People v. WeitzelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Ex Parte SohnckeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- In Re the Estate of McPheeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Rural High School District No. 1 v. School District No. 58Idaho Supreme Court · 1921
- Cohn v. IsenseeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Hough v. McCarthyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- County of Placer v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.California Supreme Court · 1958
- Carbone v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. Arcata National Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1976
- People v. PearsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.