Legal Opinion

A. S. Wickstrom, Inc. v. State

New York Court of Claims

Decided May 1, 1957No. Claim No. 33300Published

1Opinion of the CourtAlexander Del Giorno, J.

This is a motion by the claimant for an order permitting the amendment of the notice of claim. The original claim alleged breach of contract by the State by reason of which claimant sustained an additional expense of $39,354.01 due to a change of grade of spoil banks along the Clyde River channel, the relocation of which was the subject of a contract between the State and claimant. The proposed amendment adds allegations of fraud on the part of the State.

The parties entered into a contract on November 23, 1951, for the construction of a portion of the Ontario Thruway, Tyre-Montezuma Section,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Sager v. FriedmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  2. Nasaba Corp. v. Harfred Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1942
  3. Jackson v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
  4. Horowitz v. GoodmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
  5. Milliken v. McGarrahAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API