Legal Opinion

The Cincinnati Enquirer v. Cincinnati

Ohio Court of Claims

Decided February 22, 2019No. 2018-01339PQPublished

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as The Cincinnati Enquirer v. Cincinnati,

2019-Ohio-969.] THE CINCINNATI ENQUIRER, A Case No. 2018-01339PQ DIVISION OF GANNETT GP MEDIA, INC. Special Master Jeffery W. Clark Requester REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION v. CITY OF CINCINNATI Respondent {¶1} Ohio’s Public Records Act, R.C. 149.43, provides a remedy for production of records under R.C. 2743.75 if the Court of Claims determines that a public office has denied access to public records in violation of R.C. 149.43(B). The policy underlying the Act is that “open government serves the public interest and our democratic system.” State ex…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. O'Brien v. University Community Tenants Union, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Mitchell v. Lawson Milk Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State ex rel. Dann v. TaftOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State ex rel. Glasgow v. JonesOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State ex rel. Morgan v. StricklandOhio Supreme Court · 2009

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API