Legal Opinion

Oxenrider v. Gvoic

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 1954No. Docket 41; Calendar 46,171PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.

This is an action by plaintiff to recover costs of repairs to his building, loss of rentals and other damages, caused by the collapse of defendant’s adjacent brick building. The facts have been stipulated and are well stated in the opinion of the trial court, from which we quote:

“In the latter part of 1951 plaintiff owned a 3-story brick commercial building at 302-304 Woodward avenue, and the defendant owned the adjacent building to the north, described as 308-310 Woodward avenue, consisting of a 3-story building immediately adjoining plaintiff’s building and a 4-story building north of that.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wilkinson v. Detroit Steel & Spring WorksMichigan Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Detroit Board of Education v. Celotex Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Continental Paper & Supply Co. v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Roseville Plaza Ltd. Partnership v. United States Gypsum Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1992
  4. Continental Paper & Supply Co. v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Tucker v. GvoicMichigan Supreme Court · 1955

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API