Legal Opinion

Roitz v. Coldwell Banker Residential Brokerage Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 26, 1998No. B107631PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HASTINGS, J.

Defendant Coldwell Banker Residential Brokerage Company (appellant) appeals a judgment entered after the trial court confirmed an arbitration award in favor of plaintiff Mary Roitz (respondent) and denied appellant’s motion to vacate the award. We conclude that the trial court did not err and affirm the judgment.

Facts

Respondent worked for appellant as an independent contractor. Their agreement provided that it “may be terminated by either party for any reason, at any time, and without cause. . . .” The agreement also provided for binding arbitration of disputes.

After being…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Moncharsh v. Heily & BlaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Tiernan v. Trustees of California State University and CollegesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. McClenny v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Evans v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  5. United Farm Workers of America v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Sanchez v. Valencia Holding Co.California Supreme Court · 2015
  2. In Re ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Guseinov v. BurnsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  4. Michael v. Aetna Life & Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  5. Panoche Energy Center, LLC v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 2016

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API