State ex rel. Cincinnati Post v. Court of Common Pleas
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
In this action, the Post challenges the constitutionality of the trial judge’s post-verdict order that “[n]o one is to talk to the jurors about the case, and the jurors aren’t to talk to anybody about it.” We conclude that, while a more narrowly focused order might have been constitutional, this one violates the First Amendment.
I
Federal courts have struck down similar post-verdict orders on First Amendment grounds. Such a case was United States v. Sherman (C.A. 9, 1978), 581 F. 2d 1358, in which a trial court “forbade the jurors from discussing the case further with anyone * * * and * * *…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Bantam Books, Inc. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Tanner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Clark v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- State ex rel. Dispatch Printing Co. v. SoloveOhio Supreme Court · 1990
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State ex rel. Beacon Journal Publishing Co. v. BondOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- Payne v. MuskegonMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
- State ex rel. Thomas v. McGinty (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
- Rheinecker v. Forest LaboratoriesDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1993
- State Ex Rel. Butterbaugh v. Ross County Board of CommissionersOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.