Legal Opinion

People v. Arnold

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 4, 1994PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends that his absence from the side-bar questioning of a prospective juror concerning her acquaintance with a witness for the prosecution requires reversal. We disagree. The questioning of the prospective juror occurred in the presence of counsel after she responded in the affirmative to the court’s inquiry whether any of the prospective jurors was "familiar with” any of the prospective witnesses scheduled to testify. Immediately after the side-bar conference, the prospective juror was excused. We conclude that, under the circumstances *966o…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. SandovalNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. People v. AntommarchiNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. People v. VelascoNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. People v. SloanNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. People v. BurroughsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. Castro-GarciaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  2. People v. KeetonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. People v. PritchardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  4. People v. ThomasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API