Legal Opinion

Folsom-Morris Coal Mining Co. v. De Vork

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 15, 1916No. 6581PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Error from District Court, Coal County; Robert M. Rainey, Judge. Action by John De Vork, by his father and next friend, Joe De Vork, against the Folsom-Morris Coal Mining Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

COLLIER, C.

This is an action commenced by defendant in, error to recover damages in the sum of $15,000 against plaintiff in error for personal injuries. Hereinafter the parties will be designated as they were in the trial court.

The 'material evidence in the case shows that defendant was engaged in coal mining, and in connection therewith maintained a powder magazine or powder house, located on the premises of defendant, within a few hundred feet from the mouth of the coal mine, in which was kept and stored large quantities of blasting powder from which defendant furnished its…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Railroad Co. v. StoutSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Union Pacific Railway Co. v. McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. City of Shawnee v. CheekSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. Mattson v. Minnesota & North Wisconsin RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  5. Littlejohn v. Midland Valley R. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Lone Star Gas Co. v. ParsonsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  2. City of Tulsa v. McIntoshSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. Town of Depew v. KilgoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  4. Miller v. Gooding Highway Dist.Idaho Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Fisher v. BurrellOregon Supreme Court · 1925

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API