Legal Opinion

Pruess v. Udall

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided June 25, 1968No. Civ. No. 67-167PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SOLOMON, Chief Judge:

Plaintiffs seek to set aside a decision of the Secretary of the Interior denying patents for six mining claims.

This controversy began February 12, 1958, when the defendant filed invalidation proceedings against seven mining claims. At the hearing, the defendant admitted that there had been a valuable mineral discovery on the Black Jack claim and dismissed the challenge to this claim. The hearing examiner found that the land in the other six claims was mineral in character, but he concluded that a valuable mineral deposit had not been discovered. The examiner held…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. ColemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Chrisman v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. Alonzo A. Adams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
  4. C. F. Pruess, Sr. v. Stewart L. Udall, Secretary of InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
  5. Converse v. UdallDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. C. F. Pruess, Sr., Er Al. v. Stewart L. Udall, Secretary of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API