Legal Opinion
Auto Dealers Discount Corp. v. Budd
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 27, 1934PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
The defendant sheriff stored the automobile without legal authority from the owner. It follows Erdle Garage, Inc., could have no hen for storage charges. (Lien Law, § 184; Rapp v. Mabbett Motor Car Co., Inc., 201 App. Div. 283; N. Y. Yellow Cab Co. Sales Agency, Inc., v. Laurel Garage, Inc., 219 id. 329.) Having volunteered payment of storage charges incurred by the defendant sheriff, the plaintiff cannot recover therefor (Kiendl v. *38Cochrane, 153 App. Div. 802, 803); nor can it invoke the right of subrogation. (Koehler v. Hughes, 148 N. Y. 507, 511; Gerseta Corporation v. Equitable Trust Co.,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Koehler v. . HughesNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Rapp v. Mabbett Motor Car Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
- Kiendl v. CochraneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
3Cited by5 opinions
- Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. v. Dormitory Authority-StateDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Bateman v. ClarkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
- Manufacturers Trust Co. v. StehleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1956
- General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. BakerNew York City Court · 1936
- Winney v. LeuciAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1947