Legal Opinion
Bateman v. Clark
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 7, 1941PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment reversed on the law and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event. Memorandum: The plaintiff on his direct case proved all the essential elements of an action for replevin and the evidence to establish that cause of action remained uneontradieted throughout the trial. The defendant sought to establish as an affirmative defense that he was entitled to retain possession of plaintiff’s automobile by virtue of a lien for the cost of repairs made by him under section 184 of the Lien Law. The evidence is insufficient to establish that the automobile was repaired…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ballard v. . BurgettNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
- Barnard v. . CampbellNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- P. Delany & Co. v. DuvouNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- New York Yellow Cab Co. Sales Agency, Inc. v. Laurel Garage, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
- Lloyd v. KilpatrickCity of New York Municipal Court · 1911
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Campbell v. WABC Towing Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1974
- Hartford Fire Insurance v. Albertson, New York County Courts1969
- Winney v. LeuciAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1947
- de la Uz v. Car Val Motors Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1960