General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Baker
New York City Court
1Opinion of the CourtPette, J.
This is a motion for summary judgment on behalf of the plaintiff, pursuant to rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice.
From the somewhat lengthy affidavits and respective briefs, exhibits, etc., I have found the following salient and undisputed facts, which present a novel question of law in this State:
On the 21st day of May, 1936, one Fred Behan purchased an automobile from Edande Motors, Inc., and executed and delivered a certain conditional sales contract. Thereafter the said conditional sales contract was assigned to the plaintiff. The conditional sales contract was duly filed pursuant to…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- McNeil v. . the Tenth National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Saltus & Saltus v. EverettNew York Supreme Court · 1838
- Commercial Bank v. KortrightCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1839
- Weaver v. . BardenNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Ballard v. . BurgettNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bateman v. ClarkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
- Briley v. Donald Knudtson ImplementNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1961
- Meisel Tire Co. v. FishmanCity of New York Municipal Court · 1937